| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Sleep Med Res > Volume 15(4); 2024 > Article
Ebrahemzadih, Hossein Halvani, Barsang, and Khodi: Association Between Shift Work, Sleepiness, Chronic Fatigue, and Incident Occurrence in Nurses: A Generalized Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Abstract

Background and Objective

This study aimed to determine the association between shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and incident occurrence among educational hospital nurses.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out in the educational hospital in Yazd–Iran. Using a stratified sampling technique 200 nurses were selected, comprising 100 shift-working nurses and 100 non-shift-working nurses from various departments of the educational hospitals. Demographic information, sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and chronic fatigue (Chalder Fatigue Scale) were assessed via questionnaires. A checklist was used to determine the incident type, cause, location, and frequency in the past 12 months. All statistical analyses, including the development and integration of the structural equation model, were performed using STATA software version 13.

Results

The results demonstrated a statistically significant association between shift work and incident occurrence (p-value>0.001). The results of this study indicate that the chance of incidents occurring in shift-working nurses is approximately 3.6 times higher than in nurses who do not work shifts. A significant majority of nurses (86.7%) who experienced incidents showed signs of chronic fatigue syndrome and sleepiness.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that nurses in two-shift systems experience advantages such as better recovery between shifts and higher quality of life. This study provides insights to enhance nurses’ well-being, patient safety, and quality of care.

INTRODUCTION

In the field of healthcare and medical sciences, nurses are the unsung heroes who provide round-the-clock care to patients, ensuring their well-being and safety. However, the nature of their work often requires them to embrace unconventional schedules, including evenings, nights, and weekends, as healthcare facilities strive to maintain continuous coverage [1]. While this shift work arrangement allows for 24/7 patient care, it poses several challenges that can significantly impact the nurses’ own well-being and, consequently, the safety of patient care.
Nurses working in shifts face a substantial obstacle in the form of the disturbance of their intrinsic sleep-wake cycle, commonly referred to as the circadian rhythm. The task of aligning their internal body clock with the irregular working hours presents significant challenges. Consequently, this disruption frequently manifests as sleep disturbances and excessive sleepiness, impeding nurses’ ability to attain the requisite restorative sleep. Insomnia or fragmented sleep may afflict them, leading to a chronic sleep deficit. Consequently, nurses often grapple with overwhelming drowsiness during their working hours, thereby compromising their cognitive capacities, attention span, and decision-making abilities [2]. The amalgamation of shift work and sleepiness substantially amplifies the likelihood of incidents and errors among nurses, thereby ultimately imperiling the safety of their patients.
Furthermore, an enduring consequence experienced by numerous nurses engaged in shift work is chronic fatigue. The profound toll it exacts on their physical and mental welfare becomes evident as they contend incessantly with persistent exhaustion. The demanding and irregular nature of their work schedules renders them vulnerable to sustained weariness, which not only compromises their quality of life but also impedes their ability to execute their duties optimally [3]. Characterized by perpetual sensations of tiredness, diminished energy levels, and physical depletion, this chronic fatigue detrimentally affects their alertness and overall performance, thus further augmenting the probability of incidents transpiring within the healthcare environment.
In order to prioritize the well-being of nurses and ensure optimal patient care, a comprehensive understanding of the complex interrelationships among shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and incident occurrence is crucial. By thoroughly examining these factors, healthcare organizations can develop effective strategies and interventions to mitigate the risks associated with shift work, thereby enhancing the safety and welfare of both nurses and patients [4].
The primary aim of this study is to investigate the intricate relationship between shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and incident occurrence among nurses. Through a comprehensive exploration of these factors, the research seeks to gain valuable insights into the ways in which work schedules and sleep-related issues interact, ultimately influencing the likelihood of incidents. The findings from this study will contribute to the existing body of knowledge and inform future interventions and policies aimed at improving working conditions and safety for nurses in the healthcare industry. By identifying and comprehending the specific challenges faced by nurses working in shifts, such as sleep disturbances, excessive sleepiness, and chronic fatigue, this study will provide a humanizing perspective on the experiences of these dedicated professionals. It will illuminate the underlying mechanisms that link these factors to the occurrence of incidents. Furthermore, the research will generate evidence-based recommendations for healthcare organizations to implement measures that prioritize sufficient rest, mitigate fatigue, and reduce the risk of incidents among nurses working non-traditional shifts. Ultimately, the overarching objective is to enhance the overall well-being of nurses, promote patient safety, and optimize the quality of care delivered within healthcare settings.
Absolutely, understanding the factors that impact nurses’ performance is crucial for providing quality patient care. Workload, scheduling practices, breaks, and the work environment all play significant roles in nurses’ well-being and fatigue levels, which directly affect their ability to deliver optimal care [5].
Workload management is essential for nurses to avoid excessive fatigue and burnout. Healthcare organizations and policymakers can develop staffing models that distribute workloads evenly, ensuring nurses have manageable caseloads and sufficient time for recovery. Implementing policies that prioritize rest breaks and limit overtime can also contribute to mitigating fatigue [6].
Sleep quality and duration are vital for nurses to maintain their well-being and performance. Healthcare organizations can promote healthy sleep habits by providing conducive environments for rest, minimizing noise disruptions, and offering support for shift transitions. Educating nurses on the importance of sleep hygiene and providing resources for managing sleep disturbances can also be beneficial.
The work environment itself plays a significant role in nurses’ performance. Creating a supportive and safe environment that promotes open communication, teamwork, and effective leadership can positively impact nurses’ well-being and job satisfaction [7]. Addressing issues such as workplace violence, physical demands, and emotional stressors can contribute to a healthier and more fulfilling work experience for nurses.
By addressing these factors and implementing supportive measures, healthcare organizations and policymakers can prioritize the well-being of nurses. This not only benefits the nurses themselves but also enhances patient safety and the overall quality of care provided. Creating a supportive work environment means promoting healthy sleep habits, addressing workplace stressors, and providing resources and spaces for nurses to rest [8]. This kind of environment can help reduce fatigue and empower nurses to deliver safe and effective care. By understanding these factors and taking appropriate actions, we can better support nurses in their work. It enables healthcare organizations to prioritize their well-being, reduce the risks associated with fatigue, and ultimately improve patient safety. It’s essential to create a culture that values the health and performance of nurses so that they can continue to provide the best possible care to those in need.
Several studies have been conducted to address the points mentioned, providing valuable insights into the factors that impact nurses’ performance and the strategies to mitigate the risks; for example, Samaha et al. [9] revealed that mood disturbance, locus of control, and trait anxiety were significant predictors of chronic fatigue, while poor sleep quality emerged as the strongest lifestyle factor contributing to fatigue. Other lifestyle predictors included higher workload perception, lack of exercise, and the non-availability of support. Additionally, coping strategies involving alcohol use, emotional expression, and avoidance of the situation were found to significantly predict chronic fatigue
Jason et al. [10] tried to examine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) among nurses, an area that has received limited attention in the research community, particularly within the context of healthcare professionals. Two groups of nurses were recruited, and data collection involved distributing questionnaires to capture demographic characteristics and CFS-related symptoms. Nurses with CFS-like symptoms underwent structured clinical interviews and medical record reviews. The study aimed to shed light on the prevalence of CFS among nurses and contribute to the existing knowledge base. The findings have implications for understanding CFS within the nursing profession and may guide future research on this topic. Pietroiusti et al. [11] stated that night-shift work has been linked to ischemic cardiovascular disorders, but it’s still uncertain whether it directly causes metabolic syndrome (MS), a risk condition for such cardiovascular issues. MS involves visceral obesity and minor disruptions in glucose, lipid levels, and blood pressure. In this study, researchers compared the experiences of 2-shift nurses and 3-shift nurses in terms of fatigue, quality of life, turnover intention, and safety incidents. In a study by Hong et al. [12], the findings revealed that the 2-shift nurses had some advantages. They reported feeling less tired and better able to recover between shifts, which made a significant difference in their overall well-being. They also had higher scores in terms of quality of life, indicating a better quality of life overall.
Interestingly, there were no notable differences between the two groups when it came to turnover intention or the frequency of safety incidents like needle stick accidents or medication errors. This suggests that both groups were equally committed to their work and maintained a similar level of safety precautions.
The 2-shift nurses expressed that their shift system allowed them to have more downtime and personal time for themselves, which greatly contributed to their overall job satisfaction. Additionally, their shift system enabled them to provide consistent and uninterrupted care to their patients, which is crucial for ensuring quality healthcare.
The study found that a significant majority of Thai nurses, approximately 75.9%, experienced short sleep duration. This indicates that many nurses were not getting enough sleep on a regular basis. Additionally, a considerable number of nurses reported experiencing fatigue (38.2%) and excessive daytime sleepiness (49.5%). Occupational errors were reported by 11.7% of the nurses, with medication errors being the most common. Although there was a higher incidence of occupational errors in the “Short Sleep Duration” group, the difference did not reach statistical significance. However, there was a significant association between short sleep duration and excessive daytime sleepiness. This highlights the importance of adequate sleep for nurses’ well-being and performance [13]. Batak et al. [14] believed that shift workers reported significantly higher fatigue levels across all Piper Fatigue Scale items compared to non-shift workers. The study emphasizes the importance of developing suitable working schedules to address the challenges associated with shift rotation and duration, aiming to reduce the negative impact of fatigue on nurses’ well-being and overall performance. Sagherian et al. [15], in a descriptive cross-sectional study, examined the relationship between fatigue, work schedules, and perceived work performance among hospital nurses. The sample included 77 bedside nurses, mainly female and in their 20s. Nurses who worked on their off days reported higher levels of chronic fatigue compared to those who took time off. In addition, working more than 8 night shifts per month is associated with an increased likelihood of nurses experiencing insomnia, fatigue, and depression [16]. Feeling refreshed after sleep was associated with lower levels of chronic and acute fatigue and better recovery between shifts. Fatigue was linked to perceived poorer physical performance, reduced alertness, difficulty concentrating during patient care, and less effective communication. Scott et al. [17] determined several factors as contributing to the likelihood of drowsy driving episodes. These included shorter sleep durations, working night shifts, and experiencing difficulties in staying awake during work. The study emphasizes the need for increased awareness among nurses regarding the risks associated with drowsy driving. Additionally, the implementation of strategies to prevent drowsy driving episodes is recommended to ensure public safety. A study by Wang et al. [18] found that there is a direct relationship between occupational stressors and insomnia among nurses, and nurses and nursing managers should take steps to improve the psychological resources and resilience of nurses in order to mitigate the negative effects that occupational stress has on insomnia.
The study concludes that without appropriate measures to address the issue, fatigued nurses will continue to present a risk not only to themselves but also to the general public. It highlights the importance of mitigating the occurrence of drowsy driving among nurses through awareness campaigns and preventive interventions.
Zdanowicz et al. [19] examined the level of insomnia, sleepiness, and fatigue among nurses. Various scales were used to measure these factors. The findings indicated that a significant proportion of nurses reported experiencing insomnia and exceeding the threshold for fatigue compared to the general population. There was a correlation observed between insomnia, sleepiness, and fatigue. The study concludes that addressing these issues is crucial in preventing health hazards and reducing the risk of errors at work due to increased sleepiness and fatigue among nurses. In the Australian context, Dorrian et al. [20] reported that nurses experiencing exhaustion, stress, and struggled to remain awake during approximately one-third of their shifts. Sleep duration was significantly reduced on workdays compared to days off, and further reduced on workdays when an error was reported. This suggests a potential link between sleep deprivation and the occurrence of errors, and a study by Demir and Karadag [21] indicated that as the sleep quality worsened, the tendency of nurses to commit medical errors increased. The present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and incident occurrence among educational hospital nurses.

METHODS

Procedure

At the first stage, the necessary coordination with respective authorities was done. Next, a list of shift and non-shift nurses was prepared corresponding to the number of shift and non-shift nurses in each hospital. In proceeding, through implementing stratified sampling, the proper number of the participants were recruited. The particiapnts were required to fill in all questionnaires in the presence of the researcher.
Before completing the questionnaire, explanations regarding the research objectives and study content were provided to the participants and they were informed about eh voluntariness of participation. After completing the informed consent form in the first stage to select eligible individuals, the participants filled out the demographic information questionnaire. Subsequently, the participants who were eligible for the study were selected, and information about their event history was requested. Following categorization into shift and non-shift groups, questionnaires related to chronic fatigue, sleepiness, and the incident recall checklist were administered.
This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationship between shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and the occurrence of incidents among nurses.
A total of 200 nurses, comprising 100 shift-working nurses and 100 non-shift-working nurses from various departments of educational hospitals in the city of Yazd, were randomly selected using stratified sampling.
The data collection instruments employed in this study consisted of three questionnaires: a demographic information questionnaire, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaire, and the Chalder Fatigue Scale questionnaire.
The first section of the questionnaire encompassed demographic information such as age, gender, education level, marital status, and work experience. The second section evaluated the level of sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaire, which is an established eight-item questionnaire. Each item was scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with a score of 0 indicating never dozing off, 1 indicating a slight chance of dozing off, 2 indicating a moderate chance of dozing off, and 3 indicating a high chance of dozing off. The total scores ranged from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater sleepiness. Scores from 6 to 10 indicated mild sleepiness, scores from 11 to 15 indicated moderate sleepiness, and scores from 16 to 24 indicated severe sleepiness. A score higher than 10 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was considered significant and indicative of sleepiness. The Persian version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaire was translated by Sadeghniiat Haghighi et al. [22] and showed a reliability coefficient of 0.82.
The third section of the questionnaire assessed chronic fatigue using the Chalder Fatigue Scale, which consisted of 14 items measuring physical and mental signs of fatigue. Participants self-rated their fatigue on a four-point scale ranging from none (0) to a lot (3). The scale was divided into two subscales: physical fatigue (average scores of questions 1 to 8) and mental fatigue (average scores of questions 9 to 14). The validity and reliability of this scale were examined by Chalder et al. [23] in 1933, and a clinical interview symptom checklist yielded a sensitivity of 75.5% and specificity of 74.5%. The internal consistency coefficient was 85% for physical fatigue questions and 82% for mental fatigue questions. The scale was translated and validated in Iran by Nosrati in 2010, demonstrating a reliability coefficient of 83%. A cutoff score of 22 was considered for the Chalder Fatigue Scale.
The final section utilized a checklist developed by the authors, comprising five items, to ascertain the type of incident, the primary cause of the incident, the occurrence of incidents in the past 12 months, and the location of the incident.
The inclusion criteria for the study encompassed nurses with a minimum of one year of work experience who expressed willingness to participate. The exclusion criteria encompassed nurses with sleep-related disorders or a history of mental illness. All participating nurses were requested to complete the questionnaires voluntarily at a convenient time, allowing adequate time for completion. In the reminder checklist section, the interviewer provided explanations for all the questions to the nurses, who then proceeded to complete the questions.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (Code Number: IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1397.01).

Statistical Analysis

In addition to conducting descriptive analysis, the study employed various statistical techniques to investigate potential associations between the variables of interest. Univariate analyses and chi-square tests were utilized to examine the relationships between shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and incident occurrence. Furthermore, a generalized structural equation model (GSEM) was employed to simultaneously assess the concurrent associations among these variables. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses.
All statistical analyses, including the development and integration of the structural equation model, were performed using STATA software version 13 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA), which is a widely recognized statistical software package for comprehensive data analysis in research studies.

RESULT

In this study, we had the valuable participation of 143 female nurses and 57 dedicated male nurses, representing both those who work in shifts and those who work regular hours. Among the 67 incidents that occurred, 57 of them took place within the hospital, with 47 incidents involving our hardworking nurses on shift and 10 incidents involving nurses who work regular hours. Interestingly, there were 10 incidents that happened outside the hospital, with 9 of them involving our resilient nurses on shift and 1 incident involving a nurse who works regular hours (Table 1).
The findings of the study revealed that male and female nurses working in shifts experienced mild levels of sleepiness. In contrast, nurses who did not work in shifts had an average level of sleepiness considered normal. It was also interesting to note that male nurses working in shifts showed signs of fatigue, while the rest did not display such symptoms.
When looking at the incidents that occurred within the hospital, it was found that nurses involved in these incidents reported moderate levels of sleepiness and chronic fatigue. However, for incidents that took place outside the hospital, the shift-working nurses experienced more severe sleepiness compared to their non-shift-working counterparts.
Table 2 presents the percentage of nurses who experienced incidents, categorized by their shift work and their exposure to fatigue and sleepiness. It was striking to see that a significant majority of nurses (86.7%) who experienced incidents showed signs of CFS and sleepiness, particularly among those working in shifts. Moreover, among the nurses in the shift-working group who experienced incidents, 76.9% reported feeling sleepy, while chronic fatigue symptoms were not evident.
In order to examine the impact of shift work on incident occurrence, as well as the influence of sleepiness syndrome and chronic fatigue of a specific type, a path analysis known as GSEM was utilized. The reason for employing this model was to investigate the mediating role of fatigue and sleepiness variables in the relationship between shift work and incident occurrence. In other words, shift work was hypothesized to have an effect on these disorders or syndromes, which in turn led to incidents.
Firstly, it was necessary to ensure the presence of a complete effect model (total effect) by fitting the data. This model was subsequently fitted, and with a p-value of 0.001, the existence of a relationship between shift work and incident occurrence was confirmed. In the next stage, the mediating role of the two variables, sleepiness syndrome and chronic fatigue, was examined. According to this model, both paths from shift work to the mediating variable and from the mediating variables to incident occurrence were found to be significant for both mediating variables.
The examination and impact of all paths involving mediating variables on incident occurrence can be observed in Fig. 1. As shown in the table below, despite the description provided by the two mediating variables, the direct relationship remained statistically significant. In other words, the mediating variables partially played a role in this relationship.
To investigate the influence of shift work on incidents and the role of sleepiness syndrome and chronic fatigue as mediators, a path analysis called GSEM was employed. The purpose of using this model was to explore how fatigue and sleepiness variables mediate the relationship between shift work and incident occurrence. Essentially, the hypothesis was that shift work affects these specific disorders or syndromes, which, in turn, contribute to incidents.
Firstly, it was important to establish the presence of a complete effect model (total effect) by fitting the data. Once the model was fitted, the results confirmed a significant relationship between shift work and incident occurrence, as indicated by a p-value of 0.001. Moving forward, the mediating role of two variables, sleepiness syndrome and chronic fatigue, was examined. According to the model, both pathways—from shift work to the mediating variable and from the mediating variable to incident occurrence—were found to be significant for both mediators.
By considering all the paths involving the mediating variables, their impact on incident occurrence can be observed in Fig. 1. While the two mediating variables partially explained the relationship, it is important to note that the direct relationship between shift work and incidents remained statistically significant. In other words, the mediating variables only accounted for a portion of the relationship.
As a result, the final model was derived and presented in the form of a table and a figure. Based on the estimated coefficients of this model, it can be inferred that when accounting for the mediating effects of sleepiness and fatigue variables, the likelihood of incidents occurring in shift-working nurses is approximately 3.6 times higher compared to non-shift-working nurses (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

The primary objective of this research endeavor was to delve into the relationship between shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and incident occurrence among nurses. By conducting a comprehensive exploration of these factors, we acquired invaluable insights into the interplay between work schedules and sleep-related issues that impact the risk of incidents. The findings of this study hold significant implications for healthcare organizations seeking to enhance the working conditions as well as safety of nurses within the healthcare industry.
Consistent with prior investigations, our study revealed challenges faced by nurses engaged in shift work, such as sleep disturbances, excessive sleepiness, and chronic fatigue. These challenges can be attributed to the disruption of the circadian rhythm and the irregularity of their working hours. The chronic sleep deficit experienced by nurses working in shifts jeopardizes their cognitive abilities, attention span, and decision-making skills; thus, elevating the risk of incidents and errors in patient care is highly potential for them.
Existing literature confirms our findings about the impact of workload, scheduling practices, availability of breaks, and the quality and duration of sleep on nurses’ performance and fatigue levels. Studies by Samaha et al. [9] and Jason et al. [10] have emphasize factors such as sleep quality, and the prevalence of CFS in contributing to nurses’ fatigue levels [9]. Furthermore, Pietroiusti et al. [11] have reported a correlation between night-shift work and ischemic cardiovascular disorders, indicating potential health risks associated with shift work.
In our study, we compared the experiences of nurses working two shifts with those working three shifts in terms of fatigue, quality of life, turnover intention, and safety incidents, drawing upon the findings of Hong et al. [12]. The results revealed that nurses engaged in two shifts reported feeling less fatigued, better able to recuperate between shifts, and enjoying a higher overall quality of life compared to their counterparts in three-shift schedules. Nonetheless, both groups demonstrated a similar level of commitment to their work and maintained comparable levels of safety precautions, suggesting that the dedication to patient care remained uncompromised by the shift system. Furthermore, our study shed light on the prevalence of short sleep duration, fatigue, and excessive daytime sleepiness among nurses. These findings align with studies conducted by Chaiard et al. [13] and Batak et al. [14], which underscored the adverse impact of sleep deprivation and fatigue on nurses’ well-being and overall performance. The association between short sleep duration and excessive daytime sleepiness underscores the crucial role of adequate sleep in promoting nurses’ well-being and optimizing their performance.
The implications of our study carry immense significance for healthcare organizations and policymakers. By gaining a deeper understanding of the specific challenges encountered by nurses engaged in shift work, interventions can be devised to prioritize adequate rest, mitigate fatigue, and reduce the risk of incidents. Staffing models that account for manageable workloads, sufficient recovery time, and supportive work environments can contribute to enhancing nurses’ well-being and improving patient safety. Establishing a culture that values the health and performance of nurses is a pivotal factor in sustaining the delivery of high-quality care.
Notwithstanding the valuable insights gleaned from this study, it is important to acknowledge certain limitations. Firstly, the study sample was confined to a specific geographic region and may not be representative of the entire nursing population. Secondly, data collection relied on self-report measures, which are susceptible to response bias. Future research endeavors should consider including larger and more diverse samples, employing objective measures of fatigue and incident occurrence, and adopting longitudinal designs to further validate and expand upon these findings.
Previous studies have shown that shift work increases the incidence of accidents. Moreover, the literature shows that there is a significant relationship between shift work and accident occurrence [24,25]. It is believed that sleepiness and chronic fatigue are recognized as influential factors in both occupational and non-occupational accidents. This relationship is noticeable in shift work occupations because the repeated changes in sleep and wake times, can lead to disruption in sleep patterns [26]. For instance, in a study conducted by Williamson and Feyer [27] they indicated that sleepiness can double the risk of accidents. This study emphasizes that insufficient sleep and poor sleep quality can lead to decreased cognitive performance and increased human errors. In a similar vein, Saremi and colleagues found a significant association between the frequency of traffic accidents and fatigue intensity [28]. This has been also stressed by Horne and Reyner [29] found a significant relationship between fatigue and accident occurrence. These findings highlight the importance of sleep management in work environments, especially for individuals working night shifts.
Similar results to our study were found in the study by Shen et al. [30], where night shift workers experienced higher fatigue compared to day shift workers, and a statistically significant relationship was observed. Jansen et al. [31] also aligned with the findings of the study, since they found a strong relationship between fatigue and shift work. Several studies have shown that shift work is a significant factor in the development of fatigue [32], although the study conducted by Akerstedt and Folkard [33] did not find a significant relationship between shift work and fatigue, which was not consistent with the results of this study.
Multiple studies aligned with our research and observed a significant association between sleepiness and shift work [24,34-38]. Previous studies have shown that driving after a night shift increases the risk of traffic accidents [26]. A review study indicated that the risk of accidents in individuals working long shifts is doubled [39]. Another review study by Duchon and Smith [40] revealed that six out of seven studies confirmed that long working hours and shift work increase the number of occupational accidents, consistent with our study, while one study showed a decrease in occupational accidents after a 12-hour shift but did not confirm our findings. Studies by Saraei et al. [41], Ryu et al. [42], and Halvani et al. [43] also confirmed this relationship. The study by Alali et al. [44] on shift work and occupational accidents aligns with our findings, confirming a significant relationship between shift work and occupational accidents.
There were several limitations in this study. First, using self-report measures that may influenced responses. To address this threat, participants were assured that the questionnaires were anonymous and data were confidential. Next limitation is that in the present study it was assumed that each nurse has a normal workload, but it should be noted that some nurses have had more than standard load in and out of the hospital which can affect individual fatigue levels. Therefore, assessing the exact workload of nurses was challenging. In addition, the time interval between night shifts and the number of nurse shifts in a month were among the other study limitations. Nevertheless, the researchers attempted to minimize study limitations; thus, they designed a cross-over randomized clinical trial and selected nurses with an equal number of night shifts.
In light of the findings, the most common complaint resulting from shift work is sleepiness since it leads to chronic fatigue and, consequently, a lack of precise concentration and performance. The study results showed that more accidents occurred among nurses working shifts who had some symptoms of chronic fatigue and sleepiness. Based on the impact of shift work, chronic fatigue, and sleepiness on the occurrence of accidents, fundamental measures should be taken to manage shift schedules. Considering the implications mentioned, careful attention to the work scheduling and shift patterns for nurses, so that sleepiness, fatigue and accidents could be reduced accordingly. In conclusion, the findings of the present study significantly contribute to the understanding of the relationship between shift work, sleepiness, chronic fatigue, and incident occurrence among nurses. The findings stressed the challenges faced by nurses engaged in shift work to prioritize their well-being and ensure patient safety. Healthcare organizations can foster supportive work environments that promote adequate rest and mitigate the risks associated with fatigue by implementing evidence-based interventions and policies. Ultimately, these endeavors will enhance nurses’ overall well-being, optimize the quality of care provided, and improve patient outcomes.

NOTES

Availability of Data and Material
The datasets generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: all authors. Data curation: all authors. Formal analysis: Mehrzad Ebrahemzadih, Gholam Hossein Halvani. Investigation: Mehrzad Ebrahemzadih, Gholam Hossein Halvani. Methodology: all authors. Project administration:Mehrzad Ebrahemzadih, Gholam Hossein Halvani. Resources: all authors. Software: Sara Jam barsang, Mehrzad Ebrahemzadih. Validation: Sara Jam barsang. Visualization: Mehrzad Ebrahemzadih, Gholam Hossein, Sara Jam barsang. Writing—original draft: Mehrzad Ebrahemzadih, Sahar Khodi. Writing—review & editing: all authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding Statement
None

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences for the supports provided.
Incident Recall Questionnaire: In the event recall method, individuals being studied are asked whether an event (an incident resulting in harm) has occurred to them in the past year or not. If yes, the type of incident, the factors leading to the incident, and the consequences of the incident as specified in the questionnaire are inquired about. In this study, the term “incident” refers to events leading to harm.

REFERENCES

1. Mohammed S, Peter E, Killackey T, Maciver J. The “nurse as hero” discourse in the COVID-19 pandemic: a poststructural discourse analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2021;117:103887.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Khalafi N. Workplace sleepiness: causes, consequences and countermeasures [dissertation]. Rolla: Missouri University of Science and Technology 2014.

3. Webb-Anderson K. An exploration of critical care nurses’ experience of night shift fatigue and workplace napping: bringing it out from under the covers [dissertation]. Halifax: Dalhousie University 2013.

4. Andrei DM, Griffin MA, Grech M, Neal A. How demands and resources impact chronic fatigue in the maritime industry. The mediating effect of acute fatigue, sleep quality and recovery. Saf Sci 2020;121:362-72.
crossref
5. Pearson A, Pallas LO, Thomson D, Doucette E, Tucker D, Wiechula R, et al. Systematic review of evidence on the impact of nursing workload and staffing on establishing healthy work environments. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2006;4:337-84.
crossref pmid
6. Adimando A. Preventing and alleviating compassion fatigue through self-care: an educational workshop for nurses. J Holist Nurs 2018;36:304-17.
crossref pmid
7. Shirey MR. Authentic leaders creating healthy work environments for nursing practice. Am J Crit Care 2006;15:256-67.
crossref pmid
8. Nejati A, Shepley M, Rodiek S. A review of design and policy interventions to promote nurses’ restorative breaks in health care workplaces. Workplace Health Saf 2016;64:70-7.
crossref pmid
9. Samaha E, Lal S, Samaha N, Wyndham J. Psychological, lifestyle and coping contributors to chronic fatigue in shift-worker nurses. J Adv Nurs 2007;59:221-32.
crossref pmid
10. Jason LA, Wagner L, Rosenthal S, Goodlatte J, Lipkin D, Papernik M, et al. Estimating the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome among nurses. Am J Med 1998;105:91S-3.
crossref pmid
11. Pietroiusti A, Neri A, Somma G, Coppeta L, Iavicoli I, Bergamaschi A, et al. Incidence of metabolic syndrome among night-shift healthcare workers. Occup Environ Med 2010;67:54-7.
crossref pmid
12. Hong J, Kim M, Suh EE, Cho S, Jang S. Comparison of fatigue, quality of life, turnover intention, and safety incident frequency between 2-shift and 3-shift Korean nurses. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:7953.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Chaiard J, Deeluea J, Suksatit B, Songkham W, Inta N. Short sleep duration among Thai nurses: influences on fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and occupational errors. J Occup Health 2018;60:348-55.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Batak T, Gvozdenović L, Bokan D, Bokan D. The impact of nurses’ shift work on the fatigue level. South East Eur Health Sci J 2013;3:120-7.

15. Sagherian K, Clinton ME, Abu-Saad Huijer H, Geiger-Brown J. Fatigue, work schedules, and perceived performance in bedside care nurses. Workplace Health Saf 2017;65:304-12.
crossref pmid
16. Alqahtani JS, Arowosegbe A, Oyelade T, Aldhahir AM, Alghamdi SM, Alqarni AA, et al. The effect of cumulative night shift duties on insomnia, fatigue, and mental health in intensive care unit. Heliyon 2024;10:e31066.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Scott LD, Hwang WT, Rogers AE, Nysse T, Dean GE, Dinges DF. The relationship between nurse work schedules, sleep duration, and drowsy driving. Sleep 2007;30:1801-7.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Wang MF, Shao P, Wu C, Zhang LY, Zhang LF, Liang J, et al. The relationship between occupational stressors and insomnia in hospital nurses: the mediating role of psychological capital. Front Psychol 2023;13:1070809.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Zdanowicz T, Turowski K, Celej-Szuster J, Lorencowicz R, Przychodzka E. Insomnia, sleepiness, and fatigue among polish nurses. Workplace Health Saf 2020;68:272-8.
crossref pmid
20. Dorrian J, Tolley C, Lamond N, van den Heuvel C, Pincombe J, Rogers AE, et al. Sleep and errors in a group of Australian hospital nurses at work and during the commute. Appl Ergon 2008;39:605-13.
crossref pmid
21. Demir G, Karadag G. The relationship between nurses’ sleep quality and their tendency to commit medical errors. Sleep Sci 2024;17:e7-15.
crossref pmid
22. Sadeghniiat Haghighi K, Montazeri A, Khajeh Mehrizi A, Aminian O, Rahimi Golkhandan A, Saraei M, et al. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale: translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Sleep Breath 2013;17:419-26.
crossref pmid
23. Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res 1993;37:147-53.
crossref pmid
24. Gold DR, Rogacz S, Bock N, Tosteson TD, Baum TM, Speizer FE, et al. Rotating shift work, sleep, and accidents related to sleepiness in hospital nurses. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1011-4.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Smith MJ, Colligan MJ, Tasto DL. Health and safety consequences of shift work in the food processing industry. Ergonomics 1982;25:133-44.
crossref pmid
26. Monk TH, Folkarc S, Wedderburn AI. Maintaining safety and high performance on shiftwork. Appl Ergon 1996;27:17-23.
crossref pmid
27. Williamson AM, Feyer AM. Moderate sleep deprivation produces impairments in cognitive and motor performance equivalent to legally prescribed levels of alcohol intoxication. Occup Environ Med 2000;57:649-55.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Saremi M, Fallah MR. Subjective fatigue and medical errors among nurses in an educational hospital. Iran Occupational Health 2013;10:1-8.

29. Horne JA, Reyner LA. Driver sleepiness. J Sleep Res 1995;4:23-9.
crossref
30. Shen J, Botly LC, Chung SA, Gibbs AL, Sabanadzovic S, Shapiro CM. Fatigue and shift work. J Sleep Res 2006;15:1-5.
crossref
31. Jansen NW, van Amelsvoort LG, Kristensen TS, van den Brandt PA, Kant IJ. Work schedules and fatigue: a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2003;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i47-53.
crossref pmid
32. Hjollund NH, Andersen JH, Bech P. Assessment of fatigue in chronic disease: a bibliographic study of fatigue measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:12.
crossref pmid pmc
33. Akerstedt T, Folkard S. Predicting duration of sleep from the three process model of regulation of alertness. Occup Environ Med 1996;53:136-41.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Choobineh A, Javadpour F, Azmoon H, Keshavarzi S, Daneshmandi H. The prevalence of fatigue, sleepiness, and sleep disorders among petrochemical employees in Iran. Fatigue 2018;6:153-62.
crossref
35. Fido A, Ghali A. Detrimental effects of variable work shifts on quality of sleep, general health and work performance. Med Princ Pract 2008;17:453-7.
crossref pmid
36. Abbasinia M, Monazzam M, Ghasemkhani M, Sadeghniat K, Aghaee H, Asghari M, et al. Survey and comparison of sleep disorders in shift workers in the automotive industry. Iran Occupational Health 2013;10:37-44.

37. Suzuki K, Ohida T, Kaneita Y, Yokoyama E, Uchiyama M. Daytime sleepiness, sleep habits and occupational accidents among hospital nurses. J Adv Nurs 2005;52:445-53.
crossref pmid
38. Zhang L, Sun DM, Li CB, Tao MF. Influencing factors for sleep quality among shift-working nurses: a cross-sectional study in China using 3-factor Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2016;10:277-82.
crossref pmid
39. Robb G, Sultana S, Ameratunga S, Jackson R. A systematic review of epidemiological studies investigating risk factors for work-related road traffic crashes and injuries. Inj Prev 2008;14:51-8.
crossref pmid
40. Duchon JC, Smith TJ. Extended workdays and safety. Int J Ind Ergon 1993;11:37-49.
crossref
41. Saraei M, Izadi N, Najafi A, Mohajeri M, Maruf M, Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K. The relationship between sleep sharacteristics and workplace accidents. J Sleep Sci 2019;3:30-5.

42. Ryu J, Jung-Choi K, Choi KH, Kwon HJ, Kang C, Kim H. Associations of shift work and its duration with work-related injury among electronics factory workers in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:1429.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Halvani GH, Zare M, Mirmohammadi SJ. The relation between shift work, sleepiness, fatigue and accidents in Iranian Industrial Mining Group workers. Ind Health 2009;47:134-8.
crossref pmid
44. Alali H, Braeckman L, Van Hecke T, Abdel Wahab M. Shift work and occupational accident absence in Belgium: findings from the sixth European Working Condition Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:1811.
crossref pmid pmc

Fig. 1.
Hypothesized model and results of the generalized structural equation model.
smr-2024-02348f1.jpg
Table 1.
The distribution of variables categorized by shift work and non-shift work (n=200)
Variable Shift work Non-shift work Total
Gender
 Male 30 (52.6) 27 (47.4) 57 (28.5)
 Female 70 (48.9) 73 (51.1) 143 (71.5)
Age group (yr)
 21–30 56 (88.8) 7 (11.2) 63 (31.5)
 31–40 31 (32.3) 65 (67.7) 96 (48.0)
 41–50 12 (36.4) 21 (63.6) 33 (16.5)
 50–60 1 (12.5) 7 (87.5) 8 (4.0)
Marital status
 Single 28 (62.2) 17 (37.8) 45 (22.5)
 Married 69 (48.6) 73 (51.4) 142 (71.0)
 Separated 2 (28.6) 5 (71.4) 7 (3.5)
 Widowed 1 (16.6) 5 (83.4) 6 (3.0)
Work experience (yr)
 1–5 16 (88.8) 2 (11.2) 18 (9.0)
 6–10 38 (58.5) 27 (41.5) 65 (32.5)
 11–15 17 (36.9) 29 (63.1) 46 (23.0)
 16–20 13 (30.9) 29 (69.1) 42 (21.0)
 More than 20 16 (55.2) 13 (44.8) 29 (14.5)
History of incident occurrence
 Yes 56 (83.6) 11 (16.4) 67 (33.5)
 No 44 (33.1) 89 (66.9) 133 (66.5)
Venue of the event
 Inside the hospital 47 (82.4) 10 (17.6) 57 (28.5)
 Outside the hospital 9 (90.0) 1 (10.0) 10 (5.0)

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 2.
Frequency (percentage) of nurses experiencing incidents based on shift work and exposure to fatigue and sleepiness
Fatigue Sleepiness Shift work
Total
No Yes
No No Incident No 81 (74.3) 28 (25.7) 109 (100)
Yes 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0) 5 (100)
Yes Incident No 3 (30.0) 7 (70.0) 10 (100)
Yes 3 (23.1) 10 (76.9) 13 (100)
Yes No Incident No 2 (33.3) 4 (66.7) 6 (100)
Yes 0 (0) 4 (100) 4 (100)
Yes Incident No 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5) 8 (100)
Yes 6 (13.3) 39 (86.7) 45 (100)

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 3.
Estimated coefficients of the generalized structural equation model mediation analysis
Coef. p>|z| 95% conf. interval
Chronic fatigue
 Shift work 2.170783 0.000 1.431669 to 2.909898
 Shift work-constant -2.090741 0.000 -2.717148 to -1.464334
Sleepiness
 Shift work 2.181913 0.000 1.501645 to 2.862181
 Shift work-constant -1.734601 0.000 -2.283501 to -1.185701
Incident
 Shift work 1.279546 0.011 0.2961677 to 2.262924
 Chronic fatigue 1.67252 0.001 0.7283523 to 2.616688
 Sleepiness 2.644649 0.000 1.68837 to 3.600928
 Sleepiness-constant -3.455747 0.000 -4.432489 to -2.499004
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
XML Download  XML Download
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
215
View
9
Download